Pedological parameters for flow simulation in river basins
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18378/rvads.v14i1.5854Keywords:
Hydrological model, Soil database, SWAT.Abstract
Hydrological models, such as Soil and Water Assessment Tools (SWAT), are powerful water resources management tool. However, its use depends on many input data, generally from international/national bases that do not represent the regional reality of a local study. Among the input data, pedological information at regional and local scale is considered the most critical to obtaining and handling, especially in developing regions such as Brazil, and its lack leads to uncertainties in its simulations. The present paper has the purpose of present required procedures in order to obtain the values of each pedological parameter required by the SWAT to estimate average flows in watersheds. Throughout this paper are listed the procedures to obtain the pedological parameters for each class of soil, and by following these steps, we identified the values for the classes present in the study area. The study is applied to the Jucu river basin, located in the state of Espírito Santo, and will serve as reference and database for further hydrological studies of the same region or others, instead of using values that are inconsistent with their locality.Downloads
References
AKSOY, E.; OZSOY, G.; DIRIM M. S. Soil mapping approach in GIS using Landsat Satellite Imagery and DEM data. African Journal of Agricultural Research, v. 4, n. 11, p. 1295-1302, 2009.
ABBASPOUR, K. C.; ROUHOLAHNEJAD, E.; VAGHEFI, SRINIVASANB, S. R.; YANG, H.; KLØVE, B.. A continental-scale hydrology and water quality model for Europe: Calibration and uncertainty of a high-resolution large-scale SWAT model. Journal of Hydrology, v. 524, p.733-752, 2015. 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2015.03.027.
ARNOLD, J. G.; MORIASI, D. N., GASSMAN, P. W.; ABBASPOUR, K. C.; WHITE, J. M.; SRINIVASAN, R.; SANTHI, C.; HARMEL, R. D.; VAN GRIESVEN, A.; VAN LIEW, M. W.; KANNAN, N., KA, M., K. SWAT: Model use, Calibration and validation. Transactions of the ASABE, v. 55, n. 4, p. 1491-1508, 2012. 10.13031/2013.42249.
ARNOLD, J. G.; SRINIVASAN, R.; MUTTIAH, R. S.; WILLIAMS, J. R. Large area hydrologic modeling and assessment – Part I: Model development. Journal of American Water Resource Association, v.34, n.1, p. 73–89, 1998. 10.1111/j.1752-1688.1998.tb05961.x
BOUMA, J. Measuring the conductivity of soil horizons with continuous macropores. Soil science society of America, v. 46, p. 438- 441, 1982. 10.2136/sssaj1982.03615995004600020047x
BRESSIANI, D. A.; GASSMAN P. W.; FERNANDES J. G.; GARBOSSA L. H. P.; SRINIVASAN R.; BONUMÁ N. B.; MENDIONDO, E. M. Review of Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT) applications in Brazil: Challenges and prospects. International Journal of Agriculture & Biology Engineering, v.8, n.3, p. 9-35, 2015. 10.3965/j.ijabe.20150803.1765
BROUZIYNE, Y.; ABOUABDILLAH, A.; BOUABID, R.; BENAABIDATE, L.; OUESLATI, O. SWAT manual calibration and parameters sensitivity analysis in a semi-arid watershed in North-western Morocco. Arabian Journal Of Geosciences, v. 10, n. 19, p.1-13, 2017. 10.1007/s12517-017-3220-9
BUOL, S. W. Soils and agriculture in Central-West and North Brazil. Scientia Agricola, v. 66, n.5, p. 697–707, 2009. 10.1590/S0103-90162009000500016
COSGROVE, W. J.; LOUCKS, D. P. Water management: Current and future challenges and research directions. Water Resources Research, v. 51, n. 6, p.4823-4839, 2015. 10.1002/2014WR016869
DENT, D.; YONG, A. Soil survey and land evaluation. London, G. Allen e Unwin, 1981. 278 p.
DI LUZIO, M.; NORFLEET, M. L.; ARNOLD, J. G.; WILLIAMS, J. R.; KINIRY, J. R. A. A soil parameters geodatabase for the modeling assessment of agricultural conservation practices effects in the United States. International Journal of Geospatial and Environmental Research, v.1, n.2, Artigo 6, 2015.
DIAS JUNIOR, M. S.; BERTONI, J. C.; BASTOS, A. R. R. Curso de pós-graduação em solos e nutrição de plantas. Universidade Federal de Lavras, Departamento de Ciências do Solo - Setor de Física do Solo, Lavras, 2000.
EMAM, A. R.; KAPPAS, M.; NGUYEN, L. H. K.; RENCHIN, T. Hydrological Modeling in an Ungauged Basin of Central Vietnam Using SWAT Model. Hydrology And Earth System Sciences Discussions, p.1-33, 2016. 10.5194/hess-2016-44.
EMBRAPA. Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária. Levantamento de reconhecimento dos solos do estado do Espírito Santo. 1978. Disponível em: <https://www.embrapa.br/busca-de-publicacoes/-/publicacao/335800/levantamento-de-reconhecimento-dos-solos-do-estado-do-espirito-santo>. Acesso em: 8 ago. 2016.
FRANCESCONI, W.; SRINIVASAN, R.; PÉREZ-MIÑANA, E.; WILLCOCKD, S. P.; QUINTERO, M.. Using the Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT) to model ecosystem services: A systematic review. Journal of Hydrology, v. 535, p.625-636, 2016. 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2016.01.034.
FUKUNAGA, D. C.; CECÍLIO, R. A.; ZANETTI, S. S.; OLIVEIRA, L. T.; CAIADO, M. A. C. Application of the SWAT hydrologic model to a tropical watershed at Brazil. Catena v. 125, p.206-213, 2015. 10.1016/j.catena.2014.10.032.
GONÇALVES, A. D. M. de A.; LIBARDI, P. L. Análise da determinação da condutividade hidráulica do solo pelo método do perfil instantâneo. Revista Brasileira de Ciência do Solo, v. 37, p. 1174-1184, 2013. 10.1590/S0100-06832013000500007.
GYAMFI, C.; NDAMBUKI, J. M.; SALIM, R. W.. Application of SWAT Model to the Olifants Basin: Calibration, Validation and Uncertainty Analysis. Journal of Water Resource And Protection v. 08, n. 03, p.397-410, 2016. 10.4236/jwarp.2016.83033.
KOUCHI, D. H.; ESMAILI, K.; FARIDHOSSEINI, A.; SANAEINEJAD, S. H.; KHALILI, D.; ABBASPOUR, K. C. Sensitivity of calibrated parameters and water resource estimates on different objective functions and optimization algorithms. Water, v. 9, n. 6, p.384-400, 2017. 10.3390/w9060384.
LEPSCH, I. F. Status of soil surveys and demand for soil series descriptions in Brazil. Soil Horizons, v.54, n.2, p. 1-5, 2013. 10.2136/sh2013-54-2-gc.
LEYTON, J. M. O. Assessment of SWAT to enable development of watershed management plans for agricultural dominated systems under data poor conditions. Virginia, 2012. 160f. Tese (Doutorado em Biological Systems Engineering) - Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, 2012.
MALAGÓ, A.; BOURAOUI, F.; VIGIAK, O.; GRIZZETTI, B.; PASTORI, M. Modelling water and nutrient fluxes in the Danube River Basin with SWAT. Science of the Total Environment, v. 603-604, p.196-218, 2017. 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.05.242.
MOREIRA, L. L.; SCHWAMBACK, D.; RIGO, D. Sensitivity analysis of the Soil and Water Assessment Tools (SWAT) model in streamflow modeling in a rural river basin. v. 13, n. 6, e2221, 2018. 10.4136/ambi-agua.2221
NEITSCH, S. L.; ARNOLD, J. G.; WILLIAMS, J. R. Soil and water assessment tool - Theoretical Documentation: Version 2009. Temple: Blackland Research Center, Texas AgriLife Research, 2011. 647p.
OCHOA, V.; URBINA-CARDONA, N.. Tools for spatially modeling ecosystem services: Publication trends, conceptual reflections and future challenges. Ecosystem Services, v. 26, p.155-169, 2017. 10.1016/j.ecoser.2017.06.011.
PRADO, H. do. Pedologia fácil. Piracicaba: Hélio do Prado, 2013.
REICHARDT, K.; TIMM, L. C. Solo, planta e atmosfera: conceitos, processos e aplicações. Barueri, SP: Manole, 2004.
SARTONI, A.; LOMBARDI NETO, F.; GENOVEZ, A. M. Interceptação. Classificação Hidrológica de Solos Brasileiros para a Estimativa da Chuva Excedente com o Método do Serviço de Conservação do Solo dos Estados Unidos Parte 1: Classificação. Revista Brasileira de Recursos Hídricos, v.10, n. 4, p. 5-18, 2005. 10.21168/rbrh.v10n4.p5-18.
SIMONOVIC, S. P. World water dynamics: global modeling of water resources. Journal of Environmental Management, v.66, n.3, p. 249-267, 2002. 10.1006/jema.2002.0585.
SOIL CONSERVATION SERVICE (SCS). National Engineering Handbook, Section 4: Hydrology. Washington DC: Department of Agriculture, 1972. 762p.
SOIL CONSERVATION SERVICE (SCS). Soil mechanics level I. Module 3 - USDA Textural Soil Classification. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Washington, DC, 1987.
SOIL CONSERVATION SERVICE ENGINEERING DIVISION (SCS). Urban hydrology for small watersheds. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Washington, DC: Technical Release 55, 1986.
STEHR, A.; DEBELS, P.; ROMERO, F.; ALCAYAGA, H. Hydrological modelling with SWAT under limited conditions of data availability: evaluation of results from a Chilean case study. Hydrological Sciences Journal, v.53, n.3, p. 588-601, 2008. 10.1623/hysj.53.3.588.
TARAWNEH, E.; BRIDGE, J.; MACDONALD, N. A pre-calibration approach to select optimum inputs for hydrological models in data-scarce regions. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, v. 20, n. 10, p.4391-4407, 2016. 10.5194/hess-20-4391-2016.
VEIMEHYER, F. J.; HENDRICKSON, A. H. Methods of measuring field capacity and permanent wilting percentage of soils. Soil Science, v. 68, p. 75-94, 1949.
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
