Conflicts related to parity of arms: analysis of the imbalance between prosecution and defense

Authors

  • José Eduardo Sampaio de Alencar Universidade Federal de Campina Grande
  • Luzia Dayanne Gonçalves Cesário Universidade Federal de Campina Grande
  • Agílio Tomaz Marques Universidade Federal de Campina Grande
  • Francisco das Chagas Bezerra Neto Universidade Federal de Campina Grande
  • Rosana Santos de Almeida Universidade Federal de Campina Grande

Abstract

In the present time, it is possible to clearly perceive the existence of the imbalance of arms between prosecution and defense, since it is possible to identify the supremacy of the one over the other. In this context, there is a violation of the principle of parity of arms, as well as other principles, such as isonomy, contradictory and due process of law. In the factual situation, it is known that the Public Prosecutor's Office, although acting as part of the process, has prerogatives to which the defense does not have access. Thus, this research aims to analyze the discrepancy between the arms of the prosecution and defense. Thus, the factual point of the research sought to show the reader all the consequences that are caused by the non-observance of parity of arms, provided for in Article 7 of the Code of Civil Procedure and applicable to the Brazilian criminal process as explicit more precisely in its Article 3 of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Published

2023-07-21

How to Cite

José Eduardo Sampaio de Alencar, Luzia Dayanne Gonçalves Cesário, Agílio Tomaz Marques, Francisco das Chagas Bezerra Neto, & Rosana Santos de Almeida. (2023). Conflicts related to parity of arms: analysis of the imbalance between prosecution and defense. Revista Brasileira De Direito E Gestão Pública, 11(3), 918–927. Retrieved from https://gvaa.com.br/revista/index.php/RDGP/article/view/9883

Issue

Section

Artigos

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 > >>