Educação 4.0: explorando a integração transformadora da tecnologia na educação básica
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18378/rbfh.v13i3.10909Keywords:
Educational Technology; Digital Inclusion; Professional Development; Educational Assessment; Pedagogical Innovation.Abstract
This research addresses the theme of “Education 4.0: Exploring the Transformative Integration of Technology in Basic Education”, contextualizing the growing influence of technology in the contemporary educational environment. The central problem lies in the need to understand the impact of Education 4.0 on basic education, considering issues of equitable access, professional development of educators, new educational models and impact assessment. To address these issues, the Giftedean neoperspectivist paradigm was adopted, emphasizing the value of multiple perspectives and individual experiences. In addition, the hypothetical-deductive method was employed, allowing the formulation of hypotheses about the impact of technology on student learning. The research conducted a Narrative Bibliographic and Documentary Review to critically analyze the existing literature, identifying trends, challenges and opportunities. Key findings highlighted the significant impact of technology on the student learning experience, but also underscored the need to address disparities in equitable access to technology and promote professional development for educators. Gaps found include the lack of longitudinal and empirically robust studies on the impact of Education 4.0, as well as the need for more research on effective strategies for impact assessment. The contributions of the research include a comprehensive synthesis of existing literature and insights for future research on the transformative potential of technology in basic education.
References
BOOTH, A.; SUTTON, A.; PAPAIOANNOU, D. Systematic approaches to a successful literature review. 2. ed. New York: SAGE Publications, 2016.
CHALMERS, A. F. What is this thing called science? 3. ed. New York: Hackett Publishing Company, 1999.
COOPER, H. M. Synthesizing research: A guide for literature reviews. 3. ed. New York: Sage Publications, 1998.
CUBAN, L. Oversold and underused: Computers in the classroom. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2001.
DENZIN, N. K.; LINCOLN, Y. S. (Ed.). The Sage handbook of qualitative research. 3. ed. New York: Sage Publications, 2005.
DIAKOPOULOS, N. Accountability in algorithmic decision making. Communications of the ACM, v. 59, n. 2, p. 56-62, 2016. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/2818717.
FLORIDI, L. The logic of information: A theory of philosophy as conceptual design. New York: Oxford University Press, 2019.
FRASER, H. Doing research with children and young people. New York: Sage Publications, 2009.
FULLAN, M. Stratosphere: Integrating technology, pedagogy, and change knowledge. New York: Pearson, 2013.
GIL, Antônio Carlos. Métodos e técnicas de pesquisa social. 5. ed. São Paulo: Atlas, 1999.
GIL, A. C. Como elaborar projetos de pesquisa. 5. ed. São Paulo: Atlas, 2010.
GRANT, M. J.; BOOTH, A. A typology of reviews: An analysis of 14 review types and associated methodologies. Health Information and Libraries Journal, v. 26, n. 2, p. 91-108, 2009. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-1842.2009.00848.x.
GREENHALGH, T. How to read a paper: The basics of evidence-based medicine. 5. ed. New York: Wiley-Blackwell, 2014.
HATTIE, J.; TIMPERLEY, H. The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research, v. 77, n. 1, p. 81-112, 2007. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3102/003465430298487.
HEMPEL, C. G. Philosophy of natural science. New York: Prentice-Hall, 1966.
LAKATOS, I. The methodology of scientific research programmes: Volume 1: Philosophical papers. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1978.
MISHRA, P.; KOEHLER, M. J. Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record, v. 108, n. 6, p. 1017-1054, 2006.
NOBLIT, G. W.; HARE, R. D. Meta-ethnography: Synthesizing qualitative studies. New York: Sage Publications, 1988.
PETTICREW, M.; ROBERTS, H. Systematic reviews in the social sciences: A practical guide. New York: Blackwell Publishing, 2006.
POPPER, K. R. The logic of scientific discovery. New York: Routledge, 1959.
PRENSKY, M. Teaching digital natives: Partnering for real learning. New York: Corwin Press, 2010.
RODRIGUES, R. M. Pesquisa acadêmica: como facilitar o processo de preparação de suas etapas. São Paulo: Atlas, 2007.
SALMON, W. C. Scientific explanation and the causal structure of the world. New York: Princeton University Press, 1984.
SELWYN, N. Education and technology: Key issues and debates. New York: Continuum International Publishing Group, 2011.
SEVERINO, A. J. Metodologia do trabalho científico. 23. ed. São Paulo: Cortez, 2007.
SURI, H. Purposeful sampling in qualitative research synthesis. Qualitative Research Journal, v. 11, n. 2, p. 63-75, 2011. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3316/QRJ1102063.
THOMAS, J.; HARDEN, A. Methods for the thematic synthesis of qualitative research in systematic reviews. BMC Medical Research Methodology, v. 8, n. 1, p. 45, 2008. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-8-45.
WARSCHAUER, M. Technology and social inclusion: Rethinking the digital divide. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, 2004.
Downloads
Published
Versions
- 2024-09-10 (2)
- 2024-09-10 (1)
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Davi Milan , Renato Duarte Gomes , João Batista Lucena , Karina de Azevedo Santiago , Renato Henrique da Luz , Adriano Ricardo de Campos , Vanessa Cristina Sossai Camilo , Fabíola de Fátima Andrade Frimaio
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Esta é uma revista de acesso livre, onde, utiliza o termo de cessão seguindo a lei nº 9.610/1998, que altera, atualiza e consolida a legislação sobre direitos autorais no Brasil.
Autores que publicam na Revista Brasileira de Filosofia e História (RBFH) concordam com os seguintes termos:
O(s) autor(es) doravante designado(s) CEDENTE, por meio desta, cede e transfere, de forma gratuita, a propriedade dos direitos autorais relativos à OBRA à Revista Brasileira de Filosofia e História (RBFH), representada pelo Grupo Verde de Agroecologia e Abelhas (GVAA), estabelecida na Rua João Pereira de Mendonça , 90 Bairro Petropolis em Pombal - PB doravante designada CESSIONÁRIA, nas condições descritas a seguir: 1. O CEDENTE declara que é (são) autor(es) e titular(es) da propriedade dos direitos autorais da OBRA submetida. 2. O CEDENTE declara que a OBRA não infringe direitos autorais e/ou outros direitos de propriedade de terceiros, que a divulgação de imagens (caso as mesmas existam) foi autorizada e que assume integral responsabilidade moral e/ou patrimonial, pelo seu conteúdo, perante terceiros. O CEDENTE cede e transfere todos os direitos autorais relativos à OBRA à CESSIONÁRIA, especialmente os direitos de edição, de publicação, de tradução para outro idioma e de reprodução por qualquer processo ou técnica através da assinatura deste termo impresso que deverá ser submetido via correios ao endereço informado no início deste documento. A CESSIONÁRIA passa a ser proprietária exclusiva dos direitos referentes à OBRA, sendo vedada qualquer reprodução, total ou parcial, em qualquer outro meio de divulgação, impresso ou eletrônico, sem que haja prévia autorização escrita por parte da CESSIONÁRIA.
