Uma Análise Crítica de Direito Comparado: Brasil e França na Recuperação Judicial

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18378/rbfh.v13i4.11026

Abstract

Abstract

The article addresses judicial recovery in Brazil and France, highlighting the importance of this legal institute for companies in financial difficulties. In Brazil, the Recovery and Bankruptcy Law regulates the process, allowing companies to renegotiate their debts, preserve their activities and avoid bankruptcy. The objective is to maintain the economic and social benefits arising from healthy business activity. Brazilian legislation recognizes different classes of creditors, ensuring a fair and balanced approach during the recovery process. Furthermore, the new Bankruptcy Law introduced significant changes, such as the inclusion of rural producers and people who work in the field in the judicial recovery process.

 

In France, the legislation covers not only companies, but also farmers, artisans, independent professionals and guarantors. Insolvency procedures in France include declaration of bankruptcy and judicial recovery processes, with the possibility of restructuring or liquidation. The new French law also allows the company to request the suspension of executions against it for 60 days before formalizing the request for judicial recovery.

 

Both countries seek to provide an environment that allows the economic rehabilitation of companies in financial difficulties, minimizing losses to creditors and preserving jobs. The comparative analysis between Brazil and France can enrich understanding and contribute to improvements in legal systems. In summary, the article highlights the importance of judicial recovery as a legal tool to help viable companies overcome difficult times and preserve business activity.

References

Referência Bibliográfica.

ARAÚJO, Aloisio; FUNCHAL, Bruno. Nova Lei de Falências Brasileira e seu Papel no Desenvolvimento do Mercado de Crédito. Pesquisa e Planejamento Econômico, vol. 36, p. 209-254, 2006.

BRASIL, Lei de recuperação judicial e falência, disponível em: http://legislacao.planalto.gov.br/legisla/legislacao.nsf/Viw_Identificacao/lei%2011.101-2005?OpenDocument

COSTA, Ana Paula Abrão. Sistemas Legais de Insolvência, Incentivos e Mercado de Crédito: uma abordagem institucional. Maio 2004.

D. Despierre, A. Epaulard et C. Zapha (2018), « Les procédures collectives de traitement des difficultés financières des entreprises en France », France Stratégie, avril.

GLADSTON, Mamede. Manual de direito empresarial. 16. ed. Barueri SP: Atlas, 2022.

H. Almeida et T. Philippon (2007), « The risk-adjusted cost of financial distress », The Journal of Finance, 62(6), p. 2557–2586, décembre.

J. D. Angrist et J.-S. Pischke (2008), Mostly Harmless Econometrics: An Empiricist's Companion, Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2008.

L. Boisseau (2019), « La sauvegarde, une procédure collective pour prévenir des difficultés », Les Echos, mai.

MAGALHÃES, Giovani. Direito Empresarial Facilitado. 2 ed. São Paulo: Método, 2022.

SACRAMONE, Marcelo Barbosa. Manual de Direito Empresarial. 3ed. São Paulo: SaraivaJur, 2022.

TOWNSEND, Robert. Optimal Contracts and Competitive Markets with Costly State Verification, Journal of Economic Theory 21, 265-293, 1979.

Published

2024-11-10

How to Cite

Maia, J. C. F., Vingassani, G. C. M., & Targino, G. C. (2024). Uma Análise Crítica de Direito Comparado: Brasil e França na Recuperação Judicial . Revista Brasileira De Filosofia E História, 13(4), 4276–4285. https://doi.org/10.18378/rbfh.v13i4.11026

Most read articles by the same author(s)